- Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State
- Forbes/SHOOK America's Top Wealth Management Teams
- Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors
- Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State
- Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors
- Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State
- Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors
- Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State
- Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms
- Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors
- Barron's Top 100 Women Financial Advisors
- Barron's Top 1,200 Advisors
- Barron's Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams
- Barron's Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams
- Barron's Top 250 Private Wealth Management Teams
- Financial Planning 40 Under 40
- NAPA Top DC Advisor Teams
- Financial Advisor IQ Leadership Council
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State
2024
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State (1/9/24). Data as of 3/31/23.The Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State ranking was developed by SHOOK Research and is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm that includes: a measure of each team’s best practices, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State (1/12/23). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State ranking was developed by SHOOK Research and is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm that includes: a measure of each team’s best practices, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Forbes/SHOOK America’s Top Wealth Management Teams
2024
Forbes/SHOOK America’s Top Wealth Management Teams (11/13/24). Data as of 3/31/24. The Forbes/SHOOK America’s Top Wealth Management Teams ranking was developed by SHOOK Research and is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm that includes: a measure of each team’s best practices, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Forbes/SHOOK America’s Top Wealth Management Teams (11/7/23, data as of 3/31/23); (11/8/22, data as of 3/31/22). The Forbes/SHOOK America’s Top Wealth Management Teams ranking was developed by SHOOK Research and is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm that includes: a measure of each team’s best practices, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Forbes America’s Top Wealth Management Teams (11/8/22). Data as of 3/31/22. Forbes America’s Top Wealth Management Teams ranking was developed by SHOOK Research and is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm that includes: a measure of each team’s best practices, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors
2024
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (4/3/24). Data as of 6/30/23. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (4/4/23). Data as of 6/30/22. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/24/22). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/24/21). Data as of 3/31/21. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/25/20). Data as of 3/31/20. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (9/10/19). Data as of 3/31/19. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (9/12/18). Data as of 6/30/18. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2017
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (9/26/17). Data as of 6/30/17. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2016
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/3/16). Data as of 6/30/16. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State
2024
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/3/24). Data as of 6/30/23. The Forbes ranking of Top Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/4/23). Data as of 6/30/22. The Forbes ranking of Top Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (4/7/22). Data as of 6/30/21. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (2/11/21). Data as of 6/30/20. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (1/6/20). Data as of 6/30/19. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (2/20/19). Data as of 6/30/18. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (2/15/18). Data as of 6/30/17. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors
2024
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/8/24). Data as of 9/30/23. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors ranking is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/1/23). Data as of 9/30/22. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors ranking is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/4/22). Data as of 9/30/21. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors and Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews conducting in-person, by telephone and virtually to evaluate best practices, level of service, investing models and compliance records as well as quantitative data, such as revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (3/24/21). Data as of 9/30/20. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews (in-person, telephone and virtual), so we can evaluate best practices, service and investing models, compliance records, etc.; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (4/21/20). Data as of 9/30/19. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, such as telephone and in-person interviews, a review of best practices, service and investing models, and compliance records; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.
2019
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (4/30/19). Data as of 9/30/18. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (5/1/18). Data as of 9/30/17. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2017
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/28/17). Data as of 9/30/16. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State
2024
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/8/24). Data as of 9/30/23. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/1/23). Data as of 9/30/22. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/4/22). Data as of 9/30/21. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews conducting in-person, by telephone and virtually to evaluate best practices, level of service, investing models and compliance records as well as quantitative data, such as revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (3/24/21). Data as of 9/30/20. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of: qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews (in-person, telephone and virtual), so we can evaluate best practices, service and investing models, compliance records, etc.; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/21/20). Data as of 9/30/19. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of: qualitative data, such as telephone and in-person interviews, a review of best practices, service and investing models, and compliance records; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/30/19). Data as of 9/30/18. TThe Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (5/1/18). Data as of 9/30/17. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2017
Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/28/17). Data as of 9/30/16. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors
2023
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (8/8/23). Data as of 3/31/23. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion—mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews—and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (8/3/22). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion—mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews—and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (9/21/22). Data as of 3/31/21. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (7/22/20). Data as of 3/31/20. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (6/25/19). Data as of 3/31/19. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (7/25/18). Data as of 3/31/18. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2017
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (7/25/17). Data as of 3/31/17. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State
2024
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (8/8/24). Data as of 3/31/24. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion—mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews—and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (8/8/23). Data as of 3/31/23. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion—mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews—and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (8/3/22). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion—mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews—and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (7/22/20). Data as of 3/31/20. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (6/25/19). Data as of 3/31/19. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (7/25/18). Data as of 3/31/18. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2017
Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (7/25/17). Data as of 3/31/17. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms
2021
Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/12/21). Data as of 3/31/21. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (9/21/20). Data as of 3/31/20. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Rankings are based on the opinions of SHOOK Research, LLC. Past performance is not an indication of future results. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/2/19). Data as of 3/31/19. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Rankings are based on the opinions of SHOOK Research, LLC. Past performance is not an indication of future results. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/8/18). Data as of 3/31/18. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2017
Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/3/17). Data as of 3/31/17. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors
2024
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (5/10/24). Data as of 12/31/23. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/14/23). Data as of 12/31/22. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/15/22). Data as of 12/31/21. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/16/21). Data as of 12/31/20. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced
2020
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/20/20). Data as of 12/31/19. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/22/19). Data as of 12/31/18. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/21/18). Data as of 12/31/17. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2017
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/15/17). Data as of 12/31/16. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2016
Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/16/16). Data as of 12/31/2015. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Barron's Top 100 Women Financial Advisors
2024
Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (7/19/24). Data as of 3/31/24. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/16/23). Data as of 3/31/23. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/17/22). Data as of 3/31/22. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/18/21). Data as of 3/31/21. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (7/17/20). Data as of 3/31/20. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Fee paid to publication for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/7/19). Data as of 3/31/19. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/8/18). Data as of 3/31/18. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2017
Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/15/17). Data as of 3/31/17. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2016
Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/4/16). Data as of 3/31/16. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced
Barron's Top 1,200 Advisors
2024
Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/8/24). Data as of 9/30/23. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/10/23). Data as of 9/30/22. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced
2022
Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/11/22). Data as of 9/30/21. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/12/21). Data as of 9/30/20. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/13/20). Data as of 9/30/19. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/8/19). Data as of 9/30/18. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2018
Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/8/18). Data as of 9/30/17. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2017
Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/15/17). Data as of 9/30/16. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced
2016
Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/5/16). Data as of 9/30/2015. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Barron's Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams
2023
Barron's Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/16/23). Data as of 12/31/23. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Barron's Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/15/22). Data as of 12/31/21. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Barron's Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/16/21). Data as of 12/31/20. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
Barron's Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/20/20). Data as of 12/31/19. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Barron’s Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/22/19). Data as of 12/31/18. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced
Barron's Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams
2020
Barron’s Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/20/20). Data as of 12/31/19. Barron’s ranks the top 50 private wealth management teams based on size, shape, regulatory records and credentials of their members and the resources they have to serve their clients. The teams listed specialize in managing wealth on behalf of individuals and families. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2019
Barron’s Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/22/19). Data as of 12/31/18. Barron’s ranks the top 50 private wealth management teams based on size, shape, regulatory records and credentials of their members and the resources they have to serve their clients. The teams listed specialize in managing wealth on behalf of individuals and families. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Barron's Top 250 Private Wealth Management Teams
2024
Barron’s Top 250 Private Wealth Management Teams (5/10/24). Data as of 12/31/23. Barron's ranks the top 250 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Financial Planning 40 Under 40
2024
Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (2/6/24). Data as of 9/30/23. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2023, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. Financial Planning uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2023
Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (2/1/23). Data as of 9/30/22. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2022, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. FP uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (2/1/22). Data as of 9/30/21. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2021, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. FP uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (1/25/21-1/26/21). Data as of 9/30/20. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2021, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. FP uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
NAPA Top DC Advisor Teams
2023
National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA) Top DC Advisor Teams (3/19/24). Data as of 12/31/23. The NAPA Top DC Advisor Team list highlights the nation’s leading retirement plan advisor firms. The list focuses on teams, broadly defined as being in a single physical location, and having at least $100 million in DC assets under advisement. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2022
National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA) Top DC Advisor Teams (3/16/23). Data as of 12/31/22. The NAPA Top DC Advisor Team list highlights the nation’s leading retirement plan advisor firms. The list focuses on teams, broadly defined as being in a single physical location, and having at least $100 million in DC assets under advisement. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2021
National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA) Top DC Advisor Teams (3/22/22). Data as of 12/31/21. The NAPA Top DC Advisor Team list highlights the nation’s leading retirement plan advisor firms. The list focuses on teams, broadly defined as being in a single physical location, and having at least $100 million in DC assets under advisement. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
2020
National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA) Top DC Advisor Teams (3/15/21). Data as of 12/31/20. The NAPA Top DC Advisor Team list highlights the nation’s leading retirement plan advisor firms. The list focuses on teams, broadly defined as being in a single physical location, and having at least $100 million in DC assets under advisement. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
Financial Advisor IQ Leadership Council
2021
Financial Advisor IQ Leadership Council (11/22/21). Data as of 7/21. To qualify, advisors must manage or advise on at least $50 million in assets, have three or more years of experience as a financial advisor/broker, maintain an excellent compliance record, and express a desire to engage with industry issues. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.
LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR FIRM AND INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS AT FINRA BROKERCHECK.
To learn more about J.P. Morgan’s investment business, including our accounts, products and services, as well as our relationship with you, please review our J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Form CRS (PDF) and Guide to Investment Services and Brokerage Products.
This website is for informational purposes only, and not an offer, recommendation or solicitation of any product, strategy service or transaction. Any views, strategies or products discussed on this site may not be appropriate or suitable for all individuals and are subject to risks. Prior to making any investment or financial decisions, an investor should seek individualized advice from a personal financial, legal, tax and other professional advisors that take into account all of the particular facts and circumstances of an investor's own situation.
This website provides information about the brokerage and investment advisory services provided by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS). When JPMS acts as a broker-dealer, a client's relationship with us and our duties to the client will be different in some important ways than a client's relationship with us and our duties to the client when we are acting as an investment advisor. A client should carefully read the agreements and disclosures received (including our Form ADV disclosure brochure, if and when applicable) in connection with our provision of services for important information about the capacity in which we will be acting.
J.P. Morgan Wealth Management is a business of JPMorgan Chase & Co., which offers investment products and services through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser, member FINRA, and SIPC. Insurance products are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. Certain custody and other services are provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMCB). JPMS, CIA and JPMCB are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.
Investments in alternative investment strategies is speculative, often involves a greater degree of risk than traditional investments including limited liquidity and limited transparency, among other factors and should only be considered by sophisticated investors with the financial capability to accept the loss of all or part of the assets devoted to such strategies.
Borrowing with securities as collateral involves certain risks, including the possibility that you may need to deposit additional securities and/or cash in the account to meet a maintenance call, and that securities in the account may be sold to meet the maintenance call. Proper management of your account and a thorough understanding of the conditions that may affect your investments will assist you in effectively using the margin lending program.
Please read additional Important Information in conjunction with these pages.
INVESTMENT AND INSURANCE PRODUCTS ARE: • NOT FDIC INSURED • NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY • NOT A DEPOSIT OR OTHER OBLIGATION OF, OR GUARANTEED BY, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES • SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LOSS OF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INVESTED